Quoted By:
>That whole rant going from characters accepting redeeming any trash panda villain
>to going into the creators being retards self inserting into the villains being redeemed
> to the shit-eating fanbase being to blame for such acts
>to it being global problem in cartoons
>to blaming Twitter
>to saying the fandom and the creators are one and the same
>to going into the animation industry about veterans from the 80s and 90s vs art school brats
>to blaming fanfiction writers
>going back to social moral lesson problems
>the whole thing turns into a society-generation-animation problem
>going into detail about millennials being sociopathic hypocritical soccer moms and non-understanding idiots who still believe in cooties.
>mfw
the video in question https://youtu.be/tz1kwLGTzMk
Hey I loved it. As a /co/mrade I loved his rant. Pic related. However. (thought you could catch me off guard to suck your tranny jew dick? not today, jew. You're still getting gassed even if you made me feel good that one time)
This was suppose to be a review about MLP and it somehow devolved into muh society. :))) and on /co/ you've seen these rants over 10 million times over the past 10 years.
If instead his rant kept going from MLP problem #1-#999 that would had been great, he would had went into detail without going full /pol/.
Because what I'm complaining about is that MLP reviews that are specific to episodes lack the bigger picture. You need 1 general review to review the whole goddamn thing just like his SU rant and then very specific reviews catered to episodes to analyze scene by scene and dialogue line by dialogue line without veering off into 20 different subject matters even if they are intermingled like dialogue+voice acting, you need to find a balance to talk about all 2-3 aspects without veering off into the sunset with one over the other.
Like I'm ranting about personality-dialogue-voice acting, dialogue and voice acting should go back to personality without veering too heavily on the other 2 to the point I'm ranting about Sherlock Holmes dialogue/prose vs The Bible's dialogue/prose and Tara Strong doing her Bubbles voice during her sex life.
If you have any specific videos you could point me to that'd be great. I genuinely didn't know the Steven Universe rant came from a brony, I genuinely didn't look carefully at the channel's name.
This pinkiefag is funny and cute, albeit not because of her effort. In my younger, eager and more vulnerable days I'd be fuming that I'm talking to the equivalent of a parrot or a bot. It's like talking to Cleverbot or a very specific ChatGPT who wants to play.
Now in the future I question myself how could I have ever been pissed off over a literal biological bot.
>to going into the creators being retards self inserting into the villains being redeemed
> to the shit-eating fanbase being to blame for such acts
>to it being global problem in cartoons
>to blaming Twitter
>to saying the fandom and the creators are one and the same
>to going into the animation industry about veterans from the 80s and 90s vs art school brats
>to blaming fanfiction writers
>going back to social moral lesson problems
>the whole thing turns into a society-generation-animation problem
>going into detail about millennials being sociopathic hypocritical soccer moms and non-understanding idiots who still believe in cooties.
>mfw
the video in question https://youtu.be/tz1kwLGTzMk
Hey I loved it. As a /co/mrade I loved his rant. Pic related. However. (thought you could catch me off guard to suck your tranny jew dick? not today, jew. You're still getting gassed even if you made me feel good that one time)
This was suppose to be a review about MLP and it somehow devolved into muh society. :))) and on /co/ you've seen these rants over 10 million times over the past 10 years.
If instead his rant kept going from MLP problem #1-#999 that would had been great, he would had went into detail without going full /pol/.
Because what I'm complaining about is that MLP reviews that are specific to episodes lack the bigger picture. You need 1 general review to review the whole goddamn thing just like his SU rant and then very specific reviews catered to episodes to analyze scene by scene and dialogue line by dialogue line without veering off into 20 different subject matters even if they are intermingled like dialogue+voice acting, you need to find a balance to talk about all 2-3 aspects without veering off into the sunset with one over the other.
Like I'm ranting about personality-dialogue-voice acting, dialogue and voice acting should go back to personality without veering too heavily on the other 2 to the point I'm ranting about Sherlock Holmes dialogue/prose vs The Bible's dialogue/prose and Tara Strong doing her Bubbles voice during her sex life.
If you have any specific videos you could point me to that'd be great. I genuinely didn't know the Steven Universe rant came from a brony, I genuinely didn't look carefully at the channel's name.
This pinkiefag is funny and cute, albeit not because of her effort. In my younger, eager and more vulnerable days I'd be fuming that I'm talking to the equivalent of a parrot or a bot. It's like talking to Cleverbot or a very specific ChatGPT who wants to play.
Now in the future I question myself how could I have ever been pissed off over a literal biological bot.
