>>39681905Yes.
Now why did you reply with something that does nothing whatsoever to support your argument?
I don't frequent even half the threads mentioned here, but I'm certain all these connoisseurs copy-pasting the same "criticism" (totally not one samefag) are highly accomplished writers that wrote tons of greens for the good threads here (if the mentioned threads are bad, then that means there's good ones by comparison, right? Care to share? No? Didn't think so.) that definitely know what they're talking about.
Alright, now I'm feeling stupid for replying to such weak-ass bait. Back to writing, I guess. Have fun seething about the fact some threads still get greens and lore discussion as opposed to your eqgmareswithflarestranny or whatever threads you frequent, or whatever the reason for making this bait thread was.
>>39681980Thanks, anon, the thread can be closed now.