Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives,
discuss here .
Additional planned maintenance will occur with downtime the entire day of 3/15.
Threads by latest ghost replies - Page 21
Anonymous
Is this philosophy just a cope for depressed incels, or should I take it seriously?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15321682 He's an atheist. They can only think of everything as meaningless mechanical exercises.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15321046 The fact that 'anti-natalism' can exist as a concept is what creates the distinction between our universe/realm of reality and potential realities. Because it places the act of reproduction under a decision-making process rather than a purely automatic one. That's what it means. That's the whole debate, in fact.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15322855 Each one of us gets a small piece of that journey and learns from those who came before us.
I don't see why I need to be immortal to find pleasure in that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15312972 Doesn't matter because anti-natalists don't get chicks anyways lmao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15312972 Antinatalism doesn't have much to offer in terms of putting their goals into practice, mostly due to a refusal on the part of most antinatalists to acknowledge the endpoints of the philosophy.
If conception is wrong because it violates the consent of the born child, who will inevitably face pain and suffering in their lives, why do few antinatalists come to the logical conclusion that forced sterilisation is moral? Is it immoral to stop a rapist or a murderer from harming children? The argument of "it would violate bodily autonomy" does not hold scrutiny because we don't focus on the consent of the perpetrator, we focus on the person they are forcing themselves upon. Consent ends when it intrudes upon the consent of someone else - which conception DOES.
That is why I personally do not subscribe to the antinatalist framework.
Anonymous
There is no more inspiring and uplifting message than the good news of Atheism. It can turn everyone's life around. In the beginning, there was nothing. Then, something exploded in the nothingness, and it was good. Then, galaxies, stars and planets formed out of this something, and it was good. Then, on one ordinary planet of one ordinary galaxy, some slime appeared in the sea, and it was good. Then, slime turned into worms and worms turned into fish, and it was good. Then, fish crawled off the sea, climbed a tree and became a monkey, and it was good. Then, monkey fell off tree and became a man, and it was good. Then, man stood up, said: "THERE IS NO GOD" and chopped off his dick, and it was very good. Then, all stars and galaxies burned out and all something that was there dissolved back into nothing, and it was the best.
Anonymous
>>15376369 >Then, man stood up, said: "THERE IS GOD" and chopped off his dick, and it was very good. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15379001 That a large swathe of all humanity is content to licking the soles of a bunch of deities is shocking to me considering how much we collectively revile indentured servitude, tyrants, and generally having to do things we don't want to out of our own interest. Its made even more pathetic by people making religion their "interest" just to cope with the fact they believe they are evil/unworthy/powerless to the whims of some jackass higher up the rung than they are.
>but they are all-powerful and can smite us with ease sure doesn't stop any rebellious figures from rising against insurmountable odds just to be able to taste their own free will. I'd rather die a rebel for 10 seconds before I'm smitten from existence than spend what few years in this realm I have wasting away trying to please an unpleasurable jerk who presumably made me just to suck his toes. its his fault for giving me free will if he has such a problem with it. next time don't do that to your vanity project.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>15377958 Then how would religion answer that same question of "modernity"? How does the belief in a God, souls, or an afterlife answer modernity, outside of using them as an out to believe that their suffering in the material world had meaning, that their sterile conformist lives held meaning, and that they will live on after death as ethereal spirits in a realm of bliss, and that their enemies burn forever as punishment?
In the first place, I doubt many philosophers or historical figures live up to what they write about life, nor do they have an obligation to uphold those writings. The ideas should not control them, rather, they own those ideas, and thus should be able to control them or discard them whenever they no longer serve their wants or needs.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15380215,1 Regardless of one's opinions on the "Eternal Return", there probably won't be a personally-relevant difference between it and an existence where it isn't the case. If everything literally plays out the exact same way, then that means we come into the world that very same way (i.e unbound by our old experiences), because the presence of said memories would mean that things would HAVE to play out differently, as that is a necessary outcome of reorganising or introducing information into a system.
Anonymous
What can you tell me about my ancestral groups?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7563541 my mother is irish and my father is italian/polish so not at all
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7563530 no i'm not norwegian at all, actually german/irish/english/scottish, i guess it was west german tho mostly (either that or really old german that probably isnt there anymore)
i think it's just from viking rape in the british isles honestly
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7562929 Seems like you're a complete and utter Anglo, there are worse things to be
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
So who is right about this shit? Trying to ignore the politics, did slavery pave the way for the 2nd industrial revolution and SLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAVES built the country or was it dogshit and we would have built our shit faster without it?
To be fair, here's a Chud take and a lefty take.
Leftist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2d8u2QyvAo Chud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcgVcjfmYpk
Anonymous
Which of these two videos is appealing to your innate desire to be part of the cool kids club by attempting to paint the other as cringe and weird? That will give you a clue.
Anonymous
>>15385692 desu they both do it in different ways.
shauns video paints everyone on the right as antisemitic gigaraycists blah blah blah the usual breadtoob snark
Mentis paints the leftists as "useful idiots".
Anonymous
>>15385708 >shauns video paints everyone on the right as antisemitic gigaraycists Quote 3 examples.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15385712 I can see your huge nose from here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Hey faggot Jannie this thread wasn't violating any of the rules.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
etween 1940 and 1960, around 7 million Appalachian people migrated to the northern Midwestern cities, primarily coming from Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee, this increase of internal migration was the result of the decline of the coal industry and the 1924 Immigration Act forcing automotive companies to seek workers from within the country rather than immigrants. Poor Appalachian people who arrived in the metropolitan Midwestern cities were often looked down upon with disdain. In a 1953 survey conducted by Wayne State University, Detroit residents were asked to identify "undesirable people" in the city; "Poor Southern whites" and "hillbillies" were tied at the top with criminals and gangsters as the most undesirable, being considered more undesirable than "Negroes", "drifters", and "transients". They were thought to be "quick with a knife", prone to criminal behavior and coming from intensely rural backgrounds, unaccustomed to the restrictiveness of urban living. Labor unions and police departments acted against Appalachian migrants, harassing them, excluding them from unions and civic organizations, some landlords and apartment complexes would even refuse to house any white with a "southern" accent. This discrimination led poor Appalachians to unite with the most unlikely of demographics; urban blacks. The most notable example of this occurred in Chicago, when white Appalachian youth in street gangs from Uptown united with the Black Panthers to protest, march and strike for housing rights, an end to discrimination against both Appalachian and black residents of Chicago, inclusion in unions and other issues negatively impacting both communities. This eventually grew into the Rainbow Coalition, a revolutionary Maoist group with ties to the SDS and Weather Underground, representing the White Appalachian, Black and Hispanic communities of Chicago.
Afro Saxon
>>15343810 I call it Ironic cause I assume the average appalachian is harden confederateboo.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15340520 >Amerikkkan Typing that out reveals you to be a gigantic faggot who should not be taken seriously.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15344017 Eh not really. Honestly see more confederate flags and apologia in Ohio than I do west virginia
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15343818 either or. Some are cool, some are megabots, basically any post industrial place in the u.s will have that mix.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15340520 Seething Bantu scab.
Anonymous
This can't be real...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12574210 it's in fact more based since he is black. makes you realize we are not so different after all
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12574210 >turns his whole country into what's described as the "African dachau" He doesn't need to be white for this to be based.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12574106 >and once had soldiers with machine guns wearing Santa Claus outfits execute his political opponents in a stadium while amplifiers were playing Mary Hopkin's song "those were the days" Holy mother of kino. I'm supposed to hate this guy?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12574210 Hello I call him based
You don't have to be white to be based, Pol Pot was based, I'm going to build him a skatepark in iceland
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Is the Le based Third Worlders meme just a right-wing version of the noble savage myth?
Anonymous
>Whites are having more children What is the source on this? And what is defined as White? Censuses count anyone under the sun as White.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15328594 This. If environment didn’t matter Russians wouldn’t exist since they are overwhelmingly white (despite the memes) and still have a completely different mindset than Scandinavians.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15328828 There was a small but significant bump in the white birthrate during the COVID lockdown coupled with stagnation of the black and hispanic birthrates in the US. People would need unpack that to learn anything useful
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15328612 >>15328657 >Whites are not even gone from central asia, and that was entirely mediated by White males taking non-White females for repeated generations. Entire Central Asian ethnic groups like Kazakhs and Hazaras have majority non-white male haplogroups like C2 and Turkmen with Q with caucasoid maternal mtdna.
Do you have any idea WTF you are talking about?
Also even the "whitest" Central Asians like Pamiris are majority swarthoid in phenotype and would get called churkas by Russian neo nazis.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What if the Nationalists had been voted out of power sometimes between 1976 and the late 1980s (or indeed if the Nationalists had removed apartheid from their platform). Would it have been possible to reverse apartheid legislation, while maintaining white sovereignty? After all, this had been the previous status quo before 1948.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15323170 >In Rhodesia they tried a hybrid model where only land owners could vote It was intentionally made to bar Africans form attaining land lol. Try reading the requirements and the logic the state had behind them.
Anonymous
>>15323716 >You'd still have a ton of Blacks and Coloureds getting voting rights Why necessarily? Suppose sometime between 1948 and 1980 a different political party had come to power, and repealed the Population Registration and Group Areas Acts, along with some of the more draconian security laws. Doing so wouldn't by itself necessitate changing the composition of Parliament, or the qualification to vote in general election (being white). Again, it was only the National Party that came up with this idea that the only moral alternative to black majority rule was apartheid and separate development. South Africa had done without either for 50 years, and if we include the colonial period, 300 years.
Anonymous
>>15323734 >Doing so wouldn't by itself necessitate changing the composition of Parliament, or the qualification to vote in general election (being white). and that would have the non-whites still protesting that. Just like they did earlier on during the colonial South Africa years.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15323747 They protested, but they were (for the most part) not granted the ballot*.
Except for a time in Cape Colony only where some Natives were given the vote, but that was before the establishment of the Union, and was a brief experiment in any case. Also, some Coloured voters surprisingly did actually have the vote until 1968, but not enough to materially effect the outcome of any elections.*
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why are /his/ jannies like this?
Anonymous
The devil is tempting me with feelings of wanting to become a woman. Any way to fight off these temptations?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15275857 Suck a dick and decide if you like it before you decide to take estrogen
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15275857 Look at what happens to them.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Wow... Leftists are truly evil
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15271635 A current event and with political implications as brought up by the OP.
Was the discussion ever going to be about those documents? Hell no.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15271607 >Redpill the normies. Far right is winning the next elections in France. Their children kept getting murdered and raped by these “refugees” and I haven’t seen a single riot from the “far right”. Where are the native french?
>Hey these refugees kill our children, rape our women, loot our businesses, burn down our libraries but at least we will vote for a state puppet that’s a bit to the right of current year government in a few years, GOTCHA Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15271651 >why do people interested in history care about preserving history? Anonymous