Quoted By:
why doesn't he look italian?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12170960 >black-eyed, black-haired >nordic No.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12168557 Is the idea of Celts being in the gene pool around 50ishBC so outlandish? The dwelt in northern Italy for literal centuries.
Anonymous
Why is it so controversial to say that maybe the french revolutionaries were wrong?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12353119 For Marx the French Revolution was a bourgeois revolution, ie a revolution in which the bourgeoisie put themselves in power. obviously they weren't going to care what some inbred literal Celtic barbarians thought.
Political violence was a thing before d after the french Revolution, quit coping
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12351748 >The revolutions of 1989 happened because people fought the Red Army through dis-obedience, riots, strikes and places like Estonia, Lithuania, Estonia and Romania they had to fight Soviet tanks to make it permanent. The absolute state of mutt education
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This is a goddamn teen age thread if there ever was one
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12348332 You mean 100 million killed by reactionaries trying to stop the revolution (they failed and all ended up adopting its ideals later)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>12353991 Found the tiktard.
To this day, there STILL isn't a good response to this
Anonymous
>>13475315 I don't think it follows from God allowing evil that he must not be good. To show that you'd have to take on a massive burden to show that under no future contingency a particular evil could result in a greater good. That ironically would require something like omniscience.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The “problem” of evil is about why a perfectly good God would create a world with evil in it, but there being evil contained in the whole doesn’t mean the whole is itself evil—that is a composition fallacy. It could be the case that the evil complements the good, meaning that the proper arrangement of these events and these people are arranged in such and such a way so as to make the whole better, and this isn’t even unintuitive, it is a truth of art. Paintings can have ugly spots which make the whole better.
Anonymous
>>13475711 But that leads to
>>13475382 that means literally all evil in the world is justified. Someone shot up a school? Yep God meant for that to happen because it'll somehow lead to more good in the long run. If God didn't mean for that to happen it never would've happened.
It just leads to the question of why couldn't God just make everything good from the beginning if he's so powerful. Why play these games where he basically manipulates and uses people like disposable pawns, without their permission or say, effectively depriving them of their agency?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13475315 You post this thread every day and every day I'll tell you that Plato refuted this 2500 years ago. Read Plato instead of reposting this shit every day.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13475943 Who is to say that us stopping the evil would not bring about the greater good? The error in your reasoning is again that you must bear a burden that would require omniscience to show otherwise. You can’t know every future contingency. God can, and he has given us laws to operate by so as to be moral.
Quoted By:
Ask me your hardest Bible questions, and I will attempt to answer them from a Jewish / Catholic perspective.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13419558 Calvin indeed was totally depraved.
Jokes aside, the free will of mankind to choose good is never lost due mainly to the grace of God. We are able to love God because God loved us first.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13419108 >Didn't you claim to be a catholic? No. I'm a Noachide.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13419102 Actually the word of G-d.
Much older, millennary traadition, records actual history, provides foundation for the entire world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13419102 Actually the word of G-d.
Much older, millenary tradition, records actual history of the origin of mankind, provides foundation for the entire world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I got dumber reading this thread. Historically interesting info here but it matters not. It's simple. Unfold their box and walk out.
Quoted By:
They blame him for ruining the economy and being racist towards cherokee. But I don’t trust mainstream media any more (sometimes they are right but most of the times they are wrong) so how much of it is true and how much of it is false? Redpill me
Anonymous
>>13415546 Nigga, you literally voted for the host from the apprentice. It isn't some master plan, it's literally just a talking head from the TV that people voted for as a meme.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13415565 Because the Generals wanted us to fucking stay. Thats why neither Obama not Trump pulled out, the military establishment drags its feet. Biden had to just fucking do it, and fast.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13415550 >*drone strikes an Iranian general*. Only after they committed terrorist acts against foreign vessels, Bombed Saudi oil facilities, and shot down an American drone, but we will ignore these examples for your delirium.
>*constantly tries to weaken NATO*. By wanting allies to pay their fair share and commitments towards nato instead of leaning on the us for support and bolstering of it? Which inevitably means that the American taxpayers will take the burden of pain because of "allies" indifferent constraints? But TRUMP wants them to commit higher gdp for defense so that's evil and Shieeet.
>When did he show aggression to Putin? When putin stepped out of line. Oh wait? how many times did putin stepped out of line? 0. Unlike Bush, (Georgia, 2008) Obama, (Crimea, 2014) and biden. (Ukraine, 2021) But speaking of 0. Your rebuttals are terrible. Come back with some decent ones.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13415573 And what do you think that such a threat may produce? That the US was going to withdraw support if her allies Don't further commit to defence? This would cause FEAR amongst those state-
allies as they realize that daddy America would no longer protect them. As such, this fear would produce action on their part to further commit to defense to prevent such a threat. And since trump's reason for withdrawal was his perceived inadequacies and unfaithfulness on the part of his allies, he would continue support for them after their re-commitment. So with the continued support and added benefit of allied reinvestment due to fear of withdrawal. There is a net-Positive in military defense against state-enemies.
>>13415585 And yet, he has done better then "Professional" Politicians.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>no replies. Yup. I absolutely DOMINATED this thread. Trumpbro btw.
The Holy Ghost fucked Blessed Virgin Elisabeth Magdalene having John the Baptist and the Holy Ghost fucked Blessed Virgin Mary Magdalene having Jesus Christ, so the Holy Ghost is their Father. Why was Virgin Elisabeth two weeks late? Why was Virgin Mary two weeks early?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13322080 Why did the Holy Ghost give the Big D to the Blessed Virgin Elisabeth Magdalene during the March Equinox of 7 BC and why did the Holy Ghost give the Big D to the Blessed Virgin Mary Magdalene during the September Equinox of 7 BC? did the Holy Ghost not know that John the Baptist would be born Two Weeks late of the December Solstice and did the Holy Ghost not know that Jesus Christ would be born Two Weeks early of the June Solstice?
"Wimin!", the Holy Ghost said. "They are to blame."
John the Baptist
Born 6/1/6 BC
dd/mm/yyyy
Jesus the Christ
Born 6/6/6 BC
dd/mm/yyyy
Quoted By:
I mean I’m Latin American myself but almost every one of them are catholic and “staunchly trad”. They are the types to call you a larpagan despite the fact Catholicism is paganism. Why?
Anonymous
>>13293749 Does this mean mediterranians are the most attractive people on earth?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>13293932 >Italians are based because MUH DIK Not only are you the brownest Europeans, you even argue like niggers too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13294267 It's just that the darker ones are more visible, and you selectively remember only them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13293619 k doxxing you then
Quoted By:
Should racism be criminalized?
Anonymous
>>13294607 I'm talking about proportional risk that you'd face as a white person.
Anonymous
>>13294620 >I'm talking about proportional risk that you'd face as a white person. >as a white person Not white but not a negro. And about proportionality risk. I face greater risk of victimization if I spend my time around negroes than non-negroes.
>according to statistics I am more likely to be victimized by a member of my own race. Here is the catch, people spend more time around members of their own race than not. If this wasn't the case then your proportionality argument would work, but this is not the case. So I have no reason to want to befriend or spend time with negros, since they are statistically more violent to their own kind, and I don't want to get to know them enouph or spend time around them for me to become of their own.
Anonymous
>>13294770 Do you think everyone lives in a little racial bubble for fear of getting killed by le nignogs lol? Maybe look at reality instead of making up imaginary scenarios. This isn't 1900. Even if your neighbors are mostly white if you live in a decent sized city/town you probably pass black people all the time.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13294786 NTA
>Do you think everyone lives in a little racial bubble for fear of getting killed by le nignogs lol? Apparently since the vast majority of "nignogs" spend time with other "nignogs"" as reffrence by how much they kill eachother. Have you ever stepped outside of your gated community?
>Even if your neighbors are mostly white My neighbors are vastly Vietnamese/Chinese/Latino not negroes. Do you think society is one post racial uniform melting pot? The reason why people of their race kill their own than not is because the vast majority of people stay around their race.
We work around negroes. We have too. Doesn't mean we want to make friends with them or invite them in our homes or have them live on our streets in great numbers. We don't because they are violent, and commit half of all crime. You think they will magically stop if you are not negroe? Or will they keep being like that? You want us to mix when we aren't, you think they won't make become of us victims, even though they do more than they do us.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Another thread reached by the tranny janny who posts racist crap and immediately deletes the thread
Quoted By:
I'm posting here because /pol/ is braindead and full of shills shilling shills at this point. Now, the most common reasons presented as the reason for the war in Ukraine are>m-muh NATO! M-MUH NAZIS! M-MUH JOOS But: Putin doesn't care about that. He uses ideology as a tool. Forget all the fucking prattle about NATO and Nazis, it doesn't matter. It's a fucking smokescreen, something to throw off the normies and sheeple- Putin doesn't really believe in that. Putin has repeatedly claimed, that he wants to "erase the idea of Ukraine", and bring them back to the Russian state? To erase the "Nazis" or "Banderites"- That is, Ukrainian nationalists, whether or not they are faschists. Solovyov has echoed that line- And he normally toes the Kremlin lines. What Putin cares about is Russia, and Russian culture. He wants to be remembered like Peter the Great, and this is clear in his essay about historical unity of Russia and Ukraine, to stamp out an persistent challenge to the prevalent Russian identity, the idea of what it means to be "Rus", a people who see themselves as an champion of the slavonic peoples. This is common sentiment in the Russian cultural conciousness- And far from unique. Let me illustrate an example. Take, Joseph Brodsky. Russian nobelist, well-known poet. A true Russian patriot and a posthumous Hero of the Federation. He published a poem in 1992, called "On Ukrainian Independence", which you can see in the pic. It was published in the duma gazette, Пapлaмeнтcкaя гaзeтa in 2014, and talked about in media. It's full of insults for Ukraine. What's interesting, though, is how it ends: "When you are dying and scratching your deathbed, you'll be wheezing Alexander's lines and not the Taras' bullshit" And bear in mind- This was written in 1992. But what does this statement mean?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
THANKS FOR BRINGING ALL THESE HOT REDDIT TAKES HERE, FAGGOTS>op still kinda based for trying
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13187970 Do you know what also happens weeks before the invasion? Months, even? Russia building up a large invasion force at the Ukrainean border. Ukraine talking about wanting to strengthen their military in the face of a comin invasion is hardly surprising. Do you know what makes countries strengthen their militar? Enemy soliders piling up at the border.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13187970 Words of desperation. Never any realistic possibility of that happening.
>>13187964 B8
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13187970 I know there is no point in arguing with you, you are getting paid for every post, but Zelensky said that getting rid of nuclear weapons was a mistake and now since european nations aren't doing enough to protect Ukraine from its Russia, other countries will be reluctant to give up their nukes. As much as vatniks love to talk about geopolitics, they don't understand anything about it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Based janny purging slavshit shitflinging. You're not gonna turn this place into another /k/ or /pol/.