>>13703657>Otherwise, there would be around 40% of the voting people
Not an argument. People can perfectly be neurotic enough to believe that.>Secondly, GJs were class struggle oriented, and many of them were non-voting people, not RN
Stop your pilpul this instant, we have polls about it, it's not up to debate. You don't need to be a militant to put a paper in a ballot. And the divide is geographical. Those who are in RN land are perfectly aligned with the GJ sociology (in the north).
They were middle class employees from peripherical cities, left out in favor of the new fauna (which is technically less well-off, if you only consider revenues).>Thirdly, Marx and Engels were criticals of gay
That doesn't neccessarily translate politically, at all. And you know full well what I meant by that. Fag urbanites saying they need to open yuppy pockets to finance more orgies is not the same as wanting basic services and pride to apply at a national level, uniformly.