Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives,
discuss here .
Threads by latest ghost replies - Page 25
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I hate that Christianity has been turned into something it's not, (in the mainstream), because luke warm idiots who don't worship Jesus claim to be Christians and then do evil things. Their punishment in hell will be great.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>14676433 Heaven isn't real.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14676460 >not even realizing that there's no logical reason that it can't exist. and taking a chance by killing Christians is a bad gamble. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14676098 This poster is jewish.
Like the jewish war criminals who'd go around searching for Christians to murder in the 1900s during moments of turmoil and instability, like around wartimes.
The holocaust is a total fabrication too, just more jewish lies. But thankfully God has made them fools so their lies are easy to spot, hence why they've made it illegal to question their lies in much of the world.
Anonymous
>Error: You are temporarily blocked from posting for violating Global 3 - Racism. This block will expire in 13 minutes.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I would also make a basedpost, but I recently deleted my +1000 large basedjak folder
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If I recall "racism only in da /b/" was created to keep advertisers and exist on paper only
i'm a colonel in bf2
Quoted By:
fucking shitalian nigger
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why Communism is always more popular than right-wing ideas? Even marxist figures are more popular, Marx always had a Socrates/greek philosopher like aesthetic.
Anonymous
>>13704366 Proles preferred communism in western europa, until the 1980s, when a psy-op infiltrated communist parties to transform their motives from class struggle to defense of the migrants, and LGBT rights. It worked. The far right was then the only left to defend the proletariat, with the anti-immigration. Today, not even the far-right is anti-immigration. Or only in posture. Reminder that immigration didn't decrease during Trump's mandate. The wall wasn't build.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13705776 The yellow vest did move. At one point, they weren't far from going into the Elysee (presidential building). Also, the yellow vest blocked the roads. So their strategy wasn't movement oriented.
Boslhevism is "our State Capitalism" anyway. (NEP).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13703657 >Otherwise, there would be around 40% of the voting people Not an argument. People can perfectly be neurotic enough to believe that.
>Secondly, GJs were class struggle oriented, and many of them were non-voting people, not RN Stop your pilpul this instant, we have polls about it, it's not up to debate. You don't need to be a militant to put a paper in a ballot. And the divide is geographical. Those who are in RN land are perfectly aligned with the GJ sociology (in the north).
They were middle class employees from peripherical cities, left out in favor of the new fauna (which is technically less well-off, if you only consider revenues).
>Thirdly, Marx and Engels were criticals of gay That doesn't neccessarily translate politically, at all. And you know full well what I meant by that. Fag urbanites saying they need to open yuppy pockets to finance more orgies is not the same as wanting basic services and pride to apply at a national level, uniformly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13705781 Holy bad faith... The problem with Trump being that he wasn't radical enough, that warrants absolutely no support for the left.
And this no true scotsman fallacy isn't getting us anywhere. Since forever you were advocates of equality in empires and decolonization (at least after you threw out the progressist belief in different civilizational stages out of the window and took the one where every people can and has to do everything on its own)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13699904 Says the commie
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why did atheism fail?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14560585 Literally the only people in church anymore are black grandmas dragging their grandchildren they're babysitting on Sundays.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14560064 >>14560506 aww gee willickers guys >:[
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14558557 What are you doing on 4chan?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14559464 >science is a religion Ok, what should we do about it?
>follow a two thousand year old desert semite religion oh...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14559464 >when some anon's pasta triggers the tranny jannies and glownigger mods so much they delete it before deleting the low effort thread it was posted in lol
lmao
roflmao even
Anonymous
Quoted By:
There is no rational argument against incest, and yes, I still believe incest should be illegal, but that's entirely a moral argument, not a rational one
Anonymous
>>14248382 racemixing is punishable by death but it is legal
homosexuality is punishable by death but it is legal
cohabitation is punishable by death but it is legal
non-procreational sex is punishable by death but it is legal
fucking your sister is punishable by shame but it is illegal
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14235342 And that's a good thing
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14246782 But it isn't something bad or wrong. It is a relationship between people bound by blood, heritage, and culture. Definitely superior to forming relationships with strangers you don't really know and would betray you without a second thought
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14248495 And? Youndo realize there is a separation between church and state right?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14235932 Rushton did a study on it
he found out cousin marriage changes IQ by STD of 0.5
basically meaning that no difference
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Imagine if China conquered Japan and slowly assimilated all Japanese people until they became indistinguishable from themselves. As the Chinese rules over Japan, the original Japanese culture becomes wiped out. Hundreds of years later, the Chinese empire begins to weaken and fall apart. The inhabitants of Japan begin to fight for the independence. American weeaboos, longing to restore the land of their animes, volunteer to fight for the Japanese resistance. But when they arrive in Japan, they are sorely disappointed by the zhangoid faces. Their expectations of eating authentic sushi are dashed by the crypto-chinese inhabitants who eat lo mein and peking duck. The American weeaboo legion recites speeches from naruto and k-on to inspire the Japanese soldiers, but they just look on blankly. Nevertheless, they keep fighting until the Chinese overlords are pushed out. The American weeaboos are pleased that Japan exists again, but a sinking feeling that the real Japan is gone forever still lingers. Now replace China with Turkey, Japan with Greece, American weeaboos with English classical scholars, and this shit actually happened.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14321541 >silviculture and gardens are natural lol
Anonymous
>>14322675 >Alexander was a known Iranophile >He may have completely humiliated us b-but he kept le hecking administration in tact that means he liked us When the Persian burned down Athens the Greeks got there revenge. However when the Greeks burnt down Persepolis the Persians made up pathetic copes
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14322700 Not my problem.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14322700 >>He may have completely humiliated us b-but he kept le hecking administration in tact that means he liked us It was more than administration. Alexander wore Iranian clothes. Even adopted Persian gestures like introducing bowing to people in power, which was unheard of Greek culture and reserved for worship of deities alone.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Posting in an epic bread.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What makes America so impenetrable? We've never had an invasion on home soil in the history of our country. Literally every war is fought outside of America with no risk of attacks on the homeland. Is it because God is on our side?
Anonymous
>>7853601 >implying we're not also developing our own hypersonic missile technology >implying we won't have laser defenses that can reliably shoot down anything anyone shoots at us Not to mention hypersonic weaponry is still in its infancy right now. Sure, it's probably going to change the shape of warfare but right now, we still have by far and away the most powerful, capable military force on the planet. We're also one of the only nations who have looked into space warfare, which is also going to be how war is conducted in the future. Hope you like being bombarded from orbit through satellites.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7877858 It's all downhill from here though. America might be the best in the future but it will be weaker than it is today comparatively because other countries will tell it to fuck off from their regions. In 20 years China won't let America invade any Asian country.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Justification is by faith alone! >Ok, well Catholics have faith in Christ so surely they're saved >REEEE NOT THAT FAITH Why are Protestants so autistic
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14471340 I guess then ipso facto God is an asshole by your word
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14471503 But Phil 1:6 doesn't nullify what Christ teaches in John 15. To wit, you can be ENGRAFTED INTO CHRIST, and yet WILL BE **CUT OFF** if you are a branch "that does not bear fruit," John 15:2.
You retain your human freedom after you are justified. God will complete the work He has begun if you cooperate with him. But if you grow negligent, if you fail to bear fruit, you will be cut off.
I did not get around to asking you, but reading your posts, I question whether you hold the position that one text of scripture cannot contradict another text?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14471487 I have not really explained my point clearly. I'll try to now, albeit after the thread has closed.
To that end, I’ll provide my own periphrastic interpretation of the passage.
James has encountered some people who claim faith but do not believe they need to show any fruit of their faith. James then asks, can such faith save him? Now, what faith is James referring to here? The faith claimed by the interlocutor. The obvious rhetorical answer is that this man’s faith cannot save him. Faith without works is like saying I want you to be warm and well-feed without giving you a blanket or food. It’s non-sense. That’s why he concludes in verse 17 saying that such a faith, like the one the interlocutor claims, is dead “according to itself.” It’s useless.
1/
Anonymous
Quoted By:
2/ But what if someone claims “You have faith, I have works,” how can it be possible to even show you have faith without doing something? James, says, I will show you my faith by my works, but how can you show James your faith without works? If one wants to claim “I believe God is one!” Here is my faith! James responds, even the demons have that “faith.” To prove that faith without deeds is useless, James goes on to appeal to a Patriarch and a Matriarch. Abraham was considered righteous from his actions—when he placed Isaac his son on the altar. You see, Abraham’s faith synergizes [or works alongside] Abraham’s works and from his works, his faith is perfected. This fulfills what is said in Scripture “Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness and he was called a friend of God.” Faith and works cannot be separated. Even though Abraham is justified before sacrificing Isaac, his faith is perfected by offering up Isaac on the altar.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
3/ Look, Abraham proves that if you try to separate faith from works, it doesn’t work. That is because a man is justified by what he does and not from faith only. Abraham shows there is a necessary symbiotic relationship between the two wherein they cannot be separated (as James has argued in v. 18-19). A true faith is always and inseparably conjoined to works. If you need further evidence consider Rahab, the prostitute. She testifies to this symbiosis, too. Wasn’t she was justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by a different route? Even as the body with the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead. It’s impossible to have one without the other.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Puts Muhammad and Ali in Hell for being schismatics Wait how did he even know what shia islam was?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
People in Europe knew very little of Islam at the time. As far as Dante was aware, Muhammad was just trying to create another sect of Christianity.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Dante what is fame? nothing at all.. it is like a glint in the eye against the enternity of time, others will always usurp your throne of greatness, history will forget your petty rivalries and squabbles--eventually your jealousy and your name will become dust.>Also Dante You fucking little bitch hahahaha bet you don't like having a wagon wheel stuffed up your ass by huge cocked demons do you hahaha serve you right for being a more popular poet than me ahahaha hmhmhm mm yes.. the punishment fits the sin, for your arrogance, vanity, in having more sex than me and being more popular the wheel of fate will turn right up in your innard yes yes stuff it up his puckered shithole yes hahahaa
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14210602 Guénon wrote about Dante, he was initiated in some "masonic" group or something.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>petty jealously and vindictiveness plus oneitis simping truly the greatest poem of all time
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14216293 Apollyon, not Apollo you fucking retard
Anonymous
Christianity is polytheistic. The Trinity is three gods no matter how you want to square it, but technically Jesus is only "a god" because the Father is said to be his source and he is God in the proper sense apart from the shared nature of the Trinity. Not only that, many Christians literally worship bread and wine as God. Many Christians venerate Mary to a goddess like status and consider her the Queen of Heaven. Christians have thousands of saints they also pray to. They have numerous images and statues they might even offer incense too. Satan is called the "god of this world." Many Christians believe the gods of other nations exist they just say they are demons. They also have guardian angels, Pentecostals say every nation has a territorial spirit over it. How is this not polytheism?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
It's quite ok to have polytheist beliefs. It makes sense to compartmentalize your dealings with the divine and to respect different aspects of spiritual life. Monotheism is worthless for humans as God's perfect, all-encompassing nature means no verbs beyond "to be" can be used to refer to it; making for tedious reading and discussion.
Anonymous
>>14407471 Kill yourself cube worshipping subhuman
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14407471 >The Trinity is three gods no matter how you want to square it, My retarded fren, it is not. They are not the same person, but the same substance. Something similar happens when you play a videogame: you are not the avatar inside the game, but the consciousness behind it.
>bread as God Again, it is Christ substance, not person.
>Mary to a goddess That is not true.
>Queen of Heaven Well, she has an special place.
>saints They are not gods. But they became one with Christ.
>images Not gods
>demons, angels Not gods
>Nation spirit Not a dogma of the church. Also not a god.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14408831 >>14408713 Lol cross worshippers are mad
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14407471 >Mary to a goddess Sorry Mary isn't in the trinity no matter what that sad mis-mash of midrash, the talmud, arab fables and folktales known as the Koran says