>every important figure, every important invention was all produced or bred by local people
>we have no ties to any foreigners, we are not descended from any badass warrior race conquering the continent
>we are locals, our nobles are just peasants that rose through the ranks
>Spanish Nobles aren't Goths, they are Spaniards, you hear me?
>Anglo-Saxons Nobles are just Celtic Nobility with Celtic Names adopting Anglo-Saxon Culture, nothing foreign about them
>Russia was founded by Slavs, not Vikings, we were always ruled by Russians only

To me this SCREAMS of Peasants, that were educated and given a right to voice their opinions.

Which side is the lesser evil here?

I’ve heard it said by figures such as Christopher Hitchens and Gore Vidal that after WW2, America effectively took over British responsibilities and privileges. They also claim that this was the desire of the British government as they couldn’t afford the empire and were content for America to take over their old colonies because they basically shared a worldview and had the same interests.

I feel like this is a wilful misinterpretation. If you look at the Middle East in particular, the two countries jockeyed for influence as the Brits were desperate to retain hegemony over the Arabs. But is there more to it?

Give me an argument against killing people if I am powerful enough to get away with it.

They say Satan is Jesus, the Devil is No. 1, the God of this World, in the Desert teaching?

So do y'all like Daniel the prophet's (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Hele Stone / Tabernacle descriptions; Or do y'all like Son of man Ezekiel's (let him that readeth understand,) Hele Stone / Throne descriptions better? Me likes 'em both equally.

G-D the Father

Why is it /his/?

Say! Why is my Tabernacle Mishkan still under Hele Stone?

Post a manlier historical figure.

I enjoy explaining some of these to people. Any questions about obscure Irish history? Do you have any content that could fit on your own country's "iceberg"?