>>11781701intrinsic, of itself, and without context all mean the same thing.
sexual pleasure "ought to be enjoyed" in a very, very limited and specific context, therefore it isn't intrinsically good.
my personal issue with gays is not simply that they enjoy fucking as much as anyone else - it's that they want to be praised for it, and it's only to that end that they pretend to praise heterosexuals for their sexual indulgence as well.
"what we're doing isnt just for fun! its intrinsically good! because love is intrinsically good!"
sex corrupts, and love is corruptable.
its very difficult to get a heterosexual masturbator and fornicator - 99% of the population - to admit, just admit, that anything they love doing can be evil. much less difficult still than trying to convince a homosexual, who has his "pride" on the line, backed by every mainstream secular outlet and increasingly the religious as well.
because the next step, having admitted the evil, would be to stop defending it publicly. they can't do that. they want to enjoy the greatest physical pleasure available - the body's very own internal supply of opium - and then double dip by assuring themselves that its for the greater good. absolute hubris.
the most you'll get anyone to "admit" is a supposed belief in this concept: to each, their own.
very convenient, very insincere. what they mean to say is that they will look away while their opposition shrinks, while passively hoping that more people will come to their side.
the natural tendency of humanity, being, of course, to indulge in fun shit, it works out for them.