Historically speaking, was the First Galactic Civil War about sithery?

I am not a commie, I think their economical theory is laughable and I find their definition of values like freedom or democracy to be hilarious.
But why Right Wing atrocities feel so much worse to me?
Like, I usually read this like.
Communist atrocity: They are dumb and the neightboorhood starve.
Right Wing atrocity: And then the death squad raped and mutilated a family to death, including the kid because they found it funny.
Even reading about the Chankiri Tree, the tree where the KR smashed the heads of babies of "reactionary parents", I can't but feel "Well, they're literally starving, this is mercy at this point".
I am subconcious commie or what?
Also, reading memories. Fuck. Retired Left Wing executioners feel like they feel sad and just want to forget about it while Retired Right wing executioners joke and brag about their murders.

women's history month thread

Just imagine if we will colonize this big boy at some day.
It will literally become a planet-sized America.
What a shithole it would be!

Almost 100 years ago, Poland stopped bolsheviks' offensive at the outskirts of Warsaw and saved itself and Europe from the red plague. Cucked Lenin, Trotsky and even Stalin FIRST. And most importantly, they made tankies all over the world cry to this day.

Casualties of War photo thread

According to this Persian article, Alexander the Macedonian's invasion of Iran is history's biggest lie. They claim Alexander couldn't have conquered Iran.

https://tarikhema.org/ancient//37/حمله-اسکندر-مقدونی-به-ایران-بزرگترین-د/

>حمله اسکندر مقدونی به ایران بزرگترین دروغ در تاریخ

How true is this?

You will recall I extensively refuted Dr. Kaffir's two most popular image collections here

https://warosu.org/lit/thread/S14651153

He has many more. Often filled with simple things everyone knows are false ("Allah is a moon god"), other times filled with things no one really cares about ("He condemned idolatry, the pagans were the victims!") I was going to go through it all but those two prominent factors have not made it a productive use of my time. Instead I will focus on one pic with worthwhile topics and if anyone has questions about what else he said, feel free to ask itt

Here is a /lit/ Islamic discord in case you're interested
https://discord.gg/JwMCrpb

Now without further Ado


>Sunnah
He shows very early on he is no expert, but in fact has no clue what he is talking about. The Sunnah means “wont”, specifically the “wont” of the Prophet ﷺ, which includes everything from judgements to eating habits. He used google or wikipedia for a quick rundown but doesn’t actually know the meaning of the words he is using. The Sunnah and the Seerah are both described by Hadiths, which are statements. The Sunnah has legal ramifications, so it must have much stronger Hadiths. The Seerah has no legal ramification except where it overlaps the Sunnah, so there is more flexibility in Hadiths, generally how scholars go about it is using a combination of Hadiths and historical chronicles; the best Seerah available in one volume is The Sealed Nectar, it is much nore rigorous than, say, Ling’s.

Cont

As a turk living in Germany I feel the same as my ancestors did when they settled at the border of the byzantine empire in modern day turkey. They were in hostile white territory but their bravery let to conquering all that white land.
Is living in Germany as a turk equivalent to that?
Alp Arslan and Oghuz Khan are smiling at me right?

>still no good show about Aztecs
>no good movie
>no good game
>no copious amount of food porn
Guess I'm stuck playing American Conquest until Tlatoani comes out.