>>7890494>interpersonal trust>self-reportComplete nonsense, the differential in economic development between the two countries is indicative of trust differences, not a survey. The fact that you think that an inbred, clannish shithole like Pakistan is comparable to the country responsible for the majority of modern science, law and technology makes it obvious you’re bullshitting though
>so can large familiesThey’re a result of demand for the state, rule with discretion and create competition for rule which causes retaliation cycles and generates transaction costs, which lowers economic velocity far more than centralizing suppression of immoral behaviour through the state and creating rule of law
Large families and competition for rule are exactly why a single third party insurer (the state) and not competing insurers was ever developed in the first place. See the difference between northern and southern Italy, why China will never have the same GDP per capita as the US despite having a higher IQ
>are you American by any chanceMake an argument when able
>what does that have to do with anything You said “material conditions promote patriarchy”. they don’t promote anything, they occur as a natural consequence of the evolution the genders and races
>Law isn’t a static thing, it changes in timeYou don’t understand the first thing about law, or the difference between legislation, regulation and command. You mean that the law isn’t strictly construction and is often open to interpretation, which just means we should require more strict construction of any legal statements so nonsense is falsified
>It means what it says. Lawless, violent society will develop disrespect towards women due to physical inferiourity inherent to their sex.Which is covered by what I said. As a consequence of the fact that mental and physical traits are distributed normally, men will acquire more property. Women are just another form of property