>>7802044>errorThey had the specific HERC2
Even if they had brown eyes as an expression, having that gene means someone in their immediate family had blue eyes, and with lots of genetic overturn it’s likely it become expressed in at least some of the population.
>>7802054CHG has the gene for blue eyes, it’s likely blue eyes were expressed among some of them.
Also this would be evidence of CHG and WHG mixing btw, probably relegated to statistical noise due to being such a distant event but having the gene for blue eyes is highly suggestive.
>>7802055No, Stora Forvar might as well not had I1 because stora Forvar has no descendants or any immediate relatives.
>>7802058Probably not since I1 did come from a farmer population. They were farmers by the time they populated Scandinavia.
>>7802061No one gives a shit about Scotland but Scotland apparently can bantz harder than anyone in Europe lel
How many anti-Scot threads were made so far? Two I think.
Why even? I am an American anyway, leave Scotland out of this. For all you know I could be a J2w subversive, or an I2etard stirring the pot, or even a N1gger trying to defend EHG (my Autosomal DNA) and just using R1 as a shield.
I am ultimately a highlander, but you have no way of confirming this.