Quoted By:
Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.
Threads by latest ghost replies - Page 35
Quoted By: >>63801360
Animated map of last night drone and missile attack.
Quoted By:
Tanks. We're so back. Drones are last war.
Quoted By: >>63777541
>but chambered in 7.62×51mm NATO
Would this ever make sense? The SVD is very sexy looking.
Would this ever make sense? The SVD is very sexy looking.
Quoted By:
Post cool paintings involving war or weapons
Also does someone knows that painting where there’s a man maintaining his rifle, a woman on a bed and a target list on it? It used to be posted all the time in this board a few years ago but i lost it
Also does someone knows that painting where there’s a man maintaining his rifle, a woman on a bed and a target list on it? It used to be posted all the time in this board a few years ago but i lost it
Quoted By:
>The Pentagon has launched a review of the 2021 Aukus submarine deal with the UK and Australia, throwing the security pact into doubt at a time of heightened tension with China.
>The review to determine whether the US should scrap the project is being led by Elbridge Colby, a top defence department official who previously expressed scepticism about Aukus, according to six people familiar with the matter.
>Ending the submarine and advanced technology development agreement would destroy a pillar of security co-operation between the allies. The review has triggered anxiety in London and Canberra.
>One person familiar with the review said it was unclear if Colby was acting alone or as part of a wider effort by Trump administration. “Sentiment seems to be that it’s the former, but the lack of clarity has confused Congress, other government departments and Australia,” the person said.
>The review to determine whether the US should scrap the project is being led by Elbridge Colby, a top defence department official who previously expressed scepticism about Aukus, according to six people familiar with the matter.
>Ending the submarine and advanced technology development agreement would destroy a pillar of security co-operation between the allies. The review has triggered anxiety in London and Canberra.
>One person familiar with the review said it was unclear if Colby was acting alone or as part of a wider effort by Trump administration. “Sentiment seems to be that it’s the former, but the lack of clarity has confused Congress, other government departments and Australia,” the person said.
Quoted By: >>63835595
Fire up mspaint boys edition
Previous >>63808966
>Images (limit reached)
Simulate schizophrenic auditory hallucinations with the sound player plugin!
https://github.com/rcc11/4chan-sounds-player
Watch party: Ghost in the Shell
Mid July to early August
https://cytu dot be/r/zrak_
Previous >>63808966
>Images (limit reached)
Simulate schizophrenic auditory hallucinations with the sound player plugin!
https://github.com/rcc11/4chan-sounds-player
Watch party: Ghost in the Shell
Mid July to early August
https://cytu dot be/r/zrak_
Quoted By: >>63823952
https://breakingdefense.com/2025/06/not-survivable-hegseth-says-dod-reviewing-e-7-wedgetail-program-amid-move-to-space/
>During a hearing on Capitol Hill, Hegseth said in response to questions from House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rep. Tom Cole that the E-7 is an “example” of a platform that is “not survivable in the modern battlefield.” While the Pentagon is “going to fund existing platforms that are there more robustly and make sure they’re modernized,” Hegseth said that “a great deal of ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] in the future will be space-based.
>“And not in a scientific, space-based, ‘we hope we’ll get there,’ but in a ‘we’re funding capabilities that will surpass some of those airborne capabilities,’” he continued. “So we’re willing to continue to review things like the E-7, but from our view, investments in existing systems that carry forward that capability, alongside even bigger investments in space based ISR gives us the kind of advantages we need on a future battlefield.”
https://theaviationist.com/2025/06/10/usaf-brings-back-agm-183-arrw/
https://breakingdefense.com/2025/06/pentagon-procurement-budget-fy26-reconciliation-f35-bombs-f15ex-army-navy-air-force-space-force-trump/
>The procurement documents point to new programs as well. Confirming recent comments from the service’s top official, the document says the Air Force plans to spend $387.1 million to acquire the hypersonic Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW), though it does not list any specific quantities.
What do you think about the plan to go all in on space-based ISR?
And chairforce decided to buy the ARRW after all
>During a hearing on Capitol Hill, Hegseth said in response to questions from House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rep. Tom Cole that the E-7 is an “example” of a platform that is “not survivable in the modern battlefield.” While the Pentagon is “going to fund existing platforms that are there more robustly and make sure they’re modernized,” Hegseth said that “a great deal of ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] in the future will be space-based.
>“And not in a scientific, space-based, ‘we hope we’ll get there,’ but in a ‘we’re funding capabilities that will surpass some of those airborne capabilities,’” he continued. “So we’re willing to continue to review things like the E-7, but from our view, investments in existing systems that carry forward that capability, alongside even bigger investments in space based ISR gives us the kind of advantages we need on a future battlefield.”
https://theaviationist.com/2025/06/10/usaf-brings-back-agm-183-arrw/
https://breakingdefense.com/2025/06/pentagon-procurement-budget-fy26-reconciliation-f35-bombs-f15ex-army-navy-air-force-space-force-trump/
>The procurement documents point to new programs as well. Confirming recent comments from the service’s top official, the document says the Air Force plans to spend $387.1 million to acquire the hypersonic Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW), though it does not list any specific quantities.
What do you think about the plan to go all in on space-based ISR?
And chairforce decided to buy the ARRW after all
Quoted By:
E-7A won NATO's AEW&C procurement program. The contract with Boeing will be one of NATO's largest to date. A trivial price for ensuring that the Moskal Horde is terrorised by the notorious «Atomic Wedgie» for the remainder of the century (if they last that long).
ITT: spookplanes and the aesthetics thereof. awacs, elint, and so forth.
ITT: spookplanes and the aesthetics thereof. awacs, elint, and so forth.
Quoted By: >>63787549 >>63787565 >>63787575
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/britain-wants-to-launch-large-drones-from-transit-vans/
Requirements of:
- Launching UAVs up to 125kg in weight at speeds of at least 60m/s (200 km/h)
- Minimal setup and manual operation by ideally one person and no more than three
-Operation in temperatures ranging from -20 to +55°C
-Functionality in day/night, gloved, and NVG conditions
-Deployment from vehicles such as a “large body Sprinter truck” or “regular Transit van”
-The full system must not exceed 275kg
Requirements of:
- Launching UAVs up to 125kg in weight at speeds of at least 60m/s (200 km/h)
- Minimal setup and manual operation by ideally one person and no more than three
-Operation in temperatures ranging from -20 to +55°C
-Functionality in day/night, gloved, and NVG conditions
-Deployment from vehicles such as a “large body Sprinter truck” or “regular Transit van”
-The full system must not exceed 275kg
