Just came across this interview of a 22yo recounting his time in Azov. Good storytelling and all that but what struck me was how he seems to have taken the dumbest lessons possible from his experience.
Now he had some pretty childish reasons from going there in the first place, but the conclusion he's come to is basically that the the support of Ukr has to stop because the war is so horrific.
Regardless of which side you're on this just feels naive. How the hell do you turn out more naive coming back from war than going in? His rationale is essentially that western support must stop to end the war. Am I missing something or is he just retarded?https://youtu.be/vZ-iVzR_Yyc