Dear Mr. Janitor Man,

We have heard that you are new to the board, and entrusted you with keeping the community safe from off topic threads and the like.

But instead, you go around pruning threads that are semi on-topic and generally being a fag.

I wonder if it is because you are new and must exercise your newfound influence over this Icelandic harpmaking critiquing board.

We, the community, respectfully ask you, the janitor, to commit sudoku at once, since you have brought great dishonor to us all.

I'm in my second year of college, and I've recently realized that I hate what I'm studying, and want to make a drastic change. I think I would do well in the military, specifically, I want to drive a tank, and I was wondering if anyone here had any input or experience to offer.

Are you ready for the next president of the United States?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY

/k/ , what ar is this ?

Anyone interested?

The US military is the best in the world right now without a doubt.

In any single battle the US would probably come out on top. But what about a total invasion of China (assuming no nukes used by either side), do you think the US could conquer China and hold and maintain all of China's mainland?

My take: if the war dragged on, China would come out on top. They have the industrial capacity and manpower to mobilize an army superior to the US assuming a total war.

Take a real world example: the US and Soviet army pre-world war 2 was a laughing stock compared to Nazi Germany, but when both countries entered the war they closed the gap in a matter of years. Even with heavy soviet losses, and this is where China's manpower advantage is key.

Technology wise, German tanks were superior to the Americans, but the Americans could build a lot more of them for a cheaper cost (higher industrial capacity).

the manpower available to China at any given time is five times that of the United States

United States has nearly 14,000 active military aircraft, compared the to under 3,000 in China.

Active tanks: US: 8,800; China: 9,150

armored fighting vehicles: US: 41,000; China: under 5,000

China has a real edge in towed-artillery, with its military machinery featuring roughly 500% more..

Chinas navy has an estimated 200 warships more than the US navy.

https://www.change.org/p/international-olympic-committee-revoke-caitlyn-jenner-s-olympic-medals

b and pol are in on this already guys, help us get this out as much as possible.
>>>/b/619728940

Aмepикaнcкий cпeцнaзoвeц Pacceл Moзeн, oтпpaвлeнный вoeвaть нa Дoнбacc зa BCУ, пepeшeл нa cтopoнy oпoлчeнцeв, cooбщaeт Novoross. Info.
Oтмeчaeтcя, чтo cпeцнaзoвeц c дoкyмeнтaми yкpaинcкoгo cилoвикa был oтпpaвлeн нa фpoнт в кaчecтвe инcтpyктopa. Oднaкo oн нe cмoг cпoкoйнo cмoтpeть, кaк yкpaинcкиe coлдaты издeвaютcя нaд мecтным нaceлeниeм.
«27 мaя 2015 гoдa Pacceл yбил oфицepa yкpaинcкoй apмии, кoтopый пoпытaлcя изнacилoвaть Aнacтacию Гaвpилeнкo, и cкpылcя в нaпpaвлeнии фpoнтa», — cooбщил иcтoчник пopтaлa. Пo eгo дaнным, в нacтoящee вpeмя Pacceл cpaжaeтcя нa cтopoнe oпoлчeния.
Кaк гoвopит caм Pacc: «Mнe нe cocтaвилo тpyдa cбeжaть из pacпoлoжeния, нecмoтpя нa тo, чтo co мнoй былa дeвyшкa».
B ceти пoявилocь фoтo, гдe Pacc cфoтoгpaфиpoвaлcя c Hacтeй нa фoнe aмepикaнcкoгo флaгa, чтoбы пoкaзaть, чтo «нa oбoих cтopoнaх ecть нacтoящиe Люди».

So, I was reading the newest issue of AK-47 + Soviet Arms and there was a article on the Type 81.

Norinco is going to reintroduce them on the civilian market at the NR-81S, with three versions: NR-81S, NR-81S1, and NR-81S2

I'm jelly, I would like to have a Type 81, but they're very rare here in the U.S.

EAT SHIT YOU COMMIE FUCKS! TEXAS PASSED OC!! THOSE OF YOU THAT SAID IT WOULDNT, FUCK YOURSELVES WITH A CACTUS!

Texas Thread. Post your OC piece.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/05/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-texas-legislature-passes-open-carry/