Quoted By:
OK GUYS!! NEW STREAM OF TALES OF THE GUN!!! GET IN HERE
synchtuDOTbe /r/ kstream
synchtuDOTbe /r/ kstream
Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.
Additional planned maintenance will occur with downtime the entire day of 3/15.
Threads by latest ghost replies - Page 75
!OudrPWaUDQ
Quoted By: >>25272367
Standard barrel DS Arms SA 58 or the Medium Contour Barrel SA 58 and why?
Quoted By: >>25206534
Here are the conditions:
ISIS suddenly teleports into Western Ukraine and starts a fight with DPR/LPR separatists. It's summer, so ISIS won't freeze to death. Both sides gets support from their backers in terms of money and supplies. Both sides have the equipment they have now.
Who would win?
ISIS suddenly teleports into Western Ukraine and starts a fight with DPR/LPR separatists. It's summer, so ISIS won't freeze to death. Both sides gets support from their backers in terms of money and supplies. Both sides have the equipment they have now.
Who would win?
Quoted By: >>25200051
So yesterday I started a thread and completely forgot about it so let's do this again my children. Let's go full haram and watch Islams Fuck it up
Quoted By:
Is anyone going to the general meeting on the 11th of April 2015?
I'm thinking of going there and listen to what they have to say.
I'm thinking of going there and listen to what they have to say.
Quoted By:
How do you protect your virginity /k/?
!BYe7HUHHLs
Quoted By:
Last thread hit bump limit, a second recap thread was requested.
Quoted By: >>25111529
Because of my job, I've barely visited /k/ these past two months, and I'd just like an update on how things have been going with my second family while I've been gone... I've missed M00t leaving, and God knows what else.
>Has /k/ gotten better? As of January, it's been going to shit.
>Is Vladimir the candy-ass still shitting up the place or have new tripfags taken his place?
>/pol/ and plebbit still at it?
>Has Ivan Chesnokov returned? Please, for the love of god, tell me that Ivan has come back.
To keep it board related, I just bought a gun safe. What's the best way to dehumidify it?
>Has /k/ gotten better? As of January, it's been going to shit.
>Is Vladimir the candy-ass still shitting up the place or have new tripfags taken his place?
>/pol/ and plebbit still at it?
>Has Ivan Chesnokov returned? Please, for the love of god, tell me that Ivan has come back.
To keep it board related, I just bought a gun safe. What's the best way to dehumidify it?
!!yvm0QrHZZJQ
Quoted By:
Latest development in the full auto case is in!
ATF's Sur-Sur-Reply to the Sur-Reply against the case being thrown the fuck out.
A translation for those who suck at reading legalese (perhaps one of the law bros can correct this if I'm wrong)
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUR-REPLY
On March 2, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a surreply brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, and also stated: “Defendants may file a sur-sur reply on or before March 11, 2015.” Order, Mar. 2, 2015 [ECF No. 30]. In accordance with the Court’s Order, Defendants now file this brief sur-sur reply.
>Yeah, yeah, yeah. My turn to speak.
Plaintiff’s sur-reply brief adds little to the arguments before the Court.
>Dismiss everything they said, as none of it matters.
Defendants therefore rest on their previous briefs, and are prepared to address any specific questions the Court may have in a supplemental filing or at oral argument.
>Since everything they said changes nothing we've said, we're standing by it.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above and in Defendants’ opening and reply briefs, the Court should dismiss this case or enter summary judgment for Defendants.
>Because none of what they said matters, and everything we said matters, you should throw this the fuck out.
Why would they say this? On the surface this look pretty damn stupid (and continues looking stupid after the sources are picked through a bit). Let's look at the sources they provided in this document.
(1/3 - hold on to your pants, they might fly on to your head here)
ATF's Sur-Sur-Reply to the Sur-Reply against the case being thrown the fuck out.
A translation for those who suck at reading legalese (perhaps one of the law bros can correct this if I'm wrong)
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUR-REPLY
On March 2, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a surreply brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, and also stated: “Defendants may file a sur-sur reply on or before March 11, 2015.” Order, Mar. 2, 2015 [ECF No. 30]. In accordance with the Court’s Order, Defendants now file this brief sur-sur reply.
>Yeah, yeah, yeah. My turn to speak.
Plaintiff’s sur-reply brief adds little to the arguments before the Court.
>Dismiss everything they said, as none of it matters.
Defendants therefore rest on their previous briefs, and are prepared to address any specific questions the Court may have in a supplemental filing or at oral argument.
>Since everything they said changes nothing we've said, we're standing by it.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above and in Defendants’ opening and reply briefs, the Court should dismiss this case or enter summary judgment for Defendants.
>Because none of what they said matters, and everything we said matters, you should throw this the fuck out.
Why would they say this? On the surface this look pretty damn stupid (and continues looking stupid after the sources are picked through a bit). Let's look at the sources they provided in this document.
(1/3 - hold on to your pants, they might fly on to your head here)
Quoted By:
