>>58978546Time signature and melodic is unclear, and I'm not sure what you're attempting to achieve. You can try to move between time signatures and play modal music, but both require you to have a better understanding of your scales and greater fluidity. your melody timing isn't really acting with relevance or particular dissonance to your harmonic parts, so it just sounds weird. It sounds like you're maybe moving up and down multiple scales in a (mistimed) linear fashion most of the time, or throwing random notes that don't have relevance to any theme I can interpret. This makes it come off as thematically unclear and messy overall.
With all of that in mind, it does have some promise. The intro segment (33s or so) isn't terrible. It sounds like you're about to have something potentially neat happen after that, but your melodic timing got fucked and then you just scrolled down the scale (which sounded a lot like your intro theme too). Your entire song is on an A-B-A-B harmonic structure (meaning you are largely using two chords as harmony the entire time), which is something that can either ruin or make a song. If you don't have any melodic flow with such a simple harmony pattern, it will come across as messy and confusing. I think it would be helpful to listen to and study more jazz concepts if you're going to make less rigidly-structured pieces like this. Try to improve on your scales and try different chord structures.
On another note, assuming you're playing in a DAW, I recommend you try some different libs that sound better. Current one doesn't sound too great, or at least needs to be adjusted. Look up Spitfire Audio's "LABS" program for a bunch of very good offerings, all 100% free. They're still offering their $50 BBC Symphony DISCOVERY pack after completing a survey, too. Takes two weeks to be reviewed, but then you should receive your copy. That + their LABS program offerings, and maybe some EQ and volume leveling should all help a fair bit.