Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.
Search will be down for a day or two for maintenance.
...where did all the races come from? I've been thinking about it for some time and there. One possible theory might be that Ham's wife was black. But there's a huge problem, because, while it's a fact that Cush (who was Ham's descendant) means black, it would mean that his wife was also black, which in return would indicate that ALL his descendants were black. And since we know that Egypt was founded by Ham's descendants, this theory falls flat, because it's already well established that the Egyptian pharaohs were aryan R1b redheads. The second thing that defeats this theory is the presence of the other races - chinks, papuans, etc. The other theory, which I'm more confident about, says that there were humanoid creatures on the arc, which could breed with humans. Those creatures spread to Africa, where after mixing with Ham's descendants, created blacks. Other creatures include the Australian abos, the papuans, chinks, etc. What supports this theory: >blacks in Africa have a ghost DNA in them, which noone knows where it came from, >the less white you are, the less human you are and the more animalistic you are (chinks also fit this), >there's been many species going extinct over the centuries, which shows us that in the very beginning, there was WAY more species that survived the flood. Some of them might've been those humanoid creatures. What do you guys think of the theory? Do you have any other ideas?
Adolf Hitler proposed peace to England 16 times and he was rejected each time. In hindsight, should he have formed a coalition with the Soviet Union against England and Americans when he had the chance during the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact?
The victor returns home in triumph! From a homeless man on the streets of Vienna to now the near invincible supreme warlord and the sole ruler of the entire Europe, a country in front of which he fought in the trenches for four long grueling years in WW1 only to lose, and now he and his armies went there and stunned the world in defeating that very country in a matter of a mere six weeks (May-June 1940). He now returns home to his soil, a man in sheer triumph, a nation in ecstasy.
>joins a terrorist organization which is recognized as such by both the country he's in (UK) and the country he and his like-minded comrades claim to be fighting for (the Republic of Ireland) >ideals fly completely in the face of democracy as the majority of Northern Ireland's citizens want their country to remain a part of the UK (and still do today) >demands that he and his fellows be treated as political prisoners despite the fact that they are members of a recognized terrorist organization with fundamentally no legitimate political recognition anywhere in the world >starves himself to death in prison by choice
Can someone please explain to me why I am supposed to sympathize with this guy and his like-minded fellows?
How were they able to brand themselves as anti-imperialist while directly imperializing Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Siberia, etc, and indirectly imperializing other places through proxy wars and such?
>I1 cluster is the progenitors of Germanic language >Latest thesis is that this I1 cluster entered Scandinavia from the Baltics >This based on coinciding introduction of new breed of sheep in southern Scandinavia