>>105113354eh, the math doesn't add up still, he'd just be scalded.
I will still call it out. Water heaters are now technology, fuck you this isn't /diy/, how hot was this water, how did she hold him down AND to a degree that 90% of his body was burned and 10% was not. Enough for graft, enough for him to live, undocumented among the few, few cases of people living with what level of burn.
Scalded, yes, but burned? She would also be burned holding him which is significant.
This would indicate she had a full bath at temperature of the water heater (60c+ is reasonable due to safety concerns) but it would need to be ONLY hot water, she's not holding him under the tap. Think of the logistics for this, think of the time it takes to take him beyond a scalding to a third degree burn at hot water temperature.
She can do it at 100C, but also has to avoid submerging her own hand or arm.
At 100C it can be done in half a second to a second, above 100c you get in the realm of 3rd to 4th degree burn, beyond nerve damage.
Look at the location, think it through, the more reasonable explanation is that this anon had his hand submerged in 60-100c water for a time and only his hand, his deformed had. 80-100c makes sense, boiling or simmering water. It's common. It's on the hand which is documented but 90%? No. Not a chance.
Why did only his hand get up to 3rd degree burns?
It's fine to just hold his hands up and say "I exaggerated because I felt attacked".
It doesn't change shit about ambidextrousity. He still need correction for his pinky yes, but he's not a 90% 3rd degree burn victim. Nobody is boiling water in a tub large enough to submerge a child in. This isn't your sillytavern scenario.
>>105113369>whining about the term scaldingIt's accurate, facts don't care about your feelings.
If his arm and wrist were part of the claimed 90%, he was scalded.
fuck off