>>72240206>Women compete for the Best Men that can PROVIDE them with Materialistic things.again, that does not relate to getting fucked.
that relates to who they choose to marry/date for a provider
for many women in $current_year, they don't even start looking for marriage before they're 30.
>That's call the "Double-Mating Strategy" and while SOME women do that, it's VERY VERY small proportion of women that do this.wrong.
first of all, ALL women engage in the dual mating strategy, with time delay. ALL women are after chad dick in their 20s and providers in their 30s.
amd second, given current divorce laws, women are not penalized at all for pursuing the dual mating strategy. if anything, its beneficial, they get to divorce their provider chump and take half his stuff
>NO that ONLY applies to high value women.i wouldn't say high value.
i'd say at least a 6-7/10.
and honestly, who the fuck cares for women uglier than that, they may as well not exist.
>After Sexual Revolution, they enlrged it so that the top 20% of men can be Polygamous.pre-tinder, yea. i was arguably part of that top 20%, and i did get laid some.
nowadays, with tinder, its gotten even more lopsided.
5%ers and above can order pussy delivery any time they want.
everybody else is stuck in that provider role for roasties.
>Th Sexual Revolution is what really changed thngs.Technology simply made it easier for people to fnd and contact each other.
see above. technology simply exacerbated things.
i agree that it was the sexual revolution that first created the problem.