>>17554983It's an economic system, and is first and foremost a descriptive term for one. The guy who coined the term was doing so to describe a system that already existed. It later evolved into such a form that there are people who could be described as capitalists nowadays.
>And who counts as a "capitalist?"Depends on who you ask. Is this from a Communist stand point, economist stand-point?
>>17555020>By the time soft-engineering slithers out of its box into yours, human security is lurching into crisis. Cloning, lateral genodata transfer, transversal replication, and cyberotics, flood in amongst a relapse onto bacterial sex.Man, you can tell this was written in the nineties. Twenty years later and bio-tech is still torturing mice. No one can escape the ethics Longhouse, not even the Retrochronic Alien-god AI thing Land liked to rant about.
>>17556292And to think Nick Land is basically an edgy boomercon now.