Quoted By: >>16390242
After reading about the Holodomor, I can understand why Ukrainians don't want Russians around.
Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.
Recent downtime was due to a network issue. Posts were still scraped during this time. Search is working again!
Threads by latest ghost replies - Page 3
Quoted By:
He's been denounced by Asartu organizations as a LARPer and Renaissance Fair atheist.
Quoted By:
I’m going to post this every day until you remember it
!GmgU93SCyE
Quoted By:
>Contrary to popular belief, the Chinese rarely employed “human wave” attacks. Human wave assaults entail hurling masses of infantry pell-mell against a position in an effort to take that position through sheer shock and attrition. The idea is that the horde will simply swamp the position despite a lack of skills or weaponry. The Chinese regularly employed massed infantry tactics, but rarely human wave attacks. The differences are subtle but important.
>In Korea, Chinese forces were so lightly armed that they could not generate adequate firepower for virtually any military operation. Consequently, the Chinese had to employ masses of infantry for those roles in which other armies would use mechanized firepower. Specifically, Chinese armies could not use firepower to pin down or cover while another force maneuvered against it. Instead, the Chinese had to use infantry assaults for all of these tasks. In addition, the Chinese at times employed what they called the “short attack”— a rough equivalent of a classic Soviet echelon attack, albeit without tanks. In a short attack, Chinese infantry would repeatedly attack a narrow enemy sector in hope of wearing down the defenders and creating an exploitable breakthrough.
>Thus, Chinese tactics were to employ masses of infantry to maintain constant pressure on a position— just as a Western force would use firepower to do the same, while other elements outflanked and enveloped the enemy position. Obviously, this resulted in huge casualties because keeping pressure on a UN position required the Chinese to send large numbers of lightly armed infantry directly into the teeth of massive American firepower. However, this approach represents a far more sophisticated use of light infantry than what could be referred to as a "human wave" attack.
>In Korea, Chinese forces were so lightly armed that they could not generate adequate firepower for virtually any military operation. Consequently, the Chinese had to employ masses of infantry for those roles in which other armies would use mechanized firepower. Specifically, Chinese armies could not use firepower to pin down or cover while another force maneuvered against it. Instead, the Chinese had to use infantry assaults for all of these tasks. In addition, the Chinese at times employed what they called the “short attack”— a rough equivalent of a classic Soviet echelon attack, albeit without tanks. In a short attack, Chinese infantry would repeatedly attack a narrow enemy sector in hope of wearing down the defenders and creating an exploitable breakthrough.
>Thus, Chinese tactics were to employ masses of infantry to maintain constant pressure on a position— just as a Western force would use firepower to do the same, while other elements outflanked and enveloped the enemy position. Obviously, this resulted in huge casualties because keeping pressure on a UN position required the Chinese to send large numbers of lightly armed infantry directly into the teeth of massive American firepower. However, this approach represents a far more sophisticated use of light infantry than what could be referred to as a "human wave" attack.
Quoted By:
If you have a violent revolution, then the man who is good at violence(either a general, an organized gangster or an excellent guerrilla leader) will almost always take power. That's why every single communist leader was a violent crackpot with "reactionary/regressive" views. You don't need to write entire complex sociological theories to figure out why Boris, the barely literate countryside thug didn't fully understand advanced Marxist praxis
Quoted By:
>eternal hell
>original sin
>temporal fall
>filioque
>nonexistence of past and future
>limbo
>baby hell
>created grace
>divine command theory
>willfull erection control
>predestination
>total depravity
>actus purus
>just war theory
>ineradicable priesthood
>marital concupiscence
>libertarian free will
If you're ever feeling down just know he's responsible for every trash idea in western thought but was still able to be a saint and beloved intellectual
>original sin
>temporal fall
>filioque
>nonexistence of past and future
>limbo
>baby hell
>created grace
>divine command theory
>willfull erection control
>predestination
>total depravity
>actus purus
>just war theory
>ineradicable priesthood
>marital concupiscence
>libertarian free will
If you're ever feeling down just know he's responsible for every trash idea in western thought but was still able to be a saint and beloved intellectual
Quoted By: >>15193516
Post quotes exposing the concept of "War Crimes" as the pussy leftism that they are.
Quoted By: >>16915284
Quoted By: >>16907878 >>16907889 >>16907993
Was the CFA franc really some 4d chess move by evil whitey to oppress africans, or was it a benevolent gift? My guess is it's the latter considering how easily african countries can opt out of it
Quoted By: >>16850957
Vargniggers:
>le bog xDDD throw le homosexuals in le swamp xDD
Also
>Nordic mythology is full of faggotry, crossdressing and even transgenderism
>Odin dressed as a female healer as part of his efforts to seduce Rindr.
>Georges Dumézil suggested that Freyr, a Norse god of fertility, may have been worshiped by a group of homosexual or effeminate priests, as suggested by Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta Danorum.
>Norwegian archaeologist Brit Solli suggests that Odin may have been connected to a shamanistic cult that viewed gender transgression as a source of power.
>Some Old Norse deities are attested as changing their shape at will, turning into animals or otherwise disguising themselves. For example, the god Loki is attested as disguising himself as a woman. In Gylfaginning, he transforms himself into a mare and, after being chased all night by a stallion Svaðilfari, he gives birth to Sleipnir, an eight-legged foal.
>le bog xDDD throw le homosexuals in le swamp xDD
Also
>Nordic mythology is full of faggotry, crossdressing and even transgenderism
>Odin dressed as a female healer as part of his efforts to seduce Rindr.
>Georges Dumézil suggested that Freyr, a Norse god of fertility, may have been worshiped by a group of homosexual or effeminate priests, as suggested by Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta Danorum.
>Norwegian archaeologist Brit Solli suggests that Odin may have been connected to a shamanistic cult that viewed gender transgression as a source of power.
>Some Old Norse deities are attested as changing their shape at will, turning into animals or otherwise disguising themselves. For example, the god Loki is attested as disguising himself as a woman. In Gylfaginning, he transforms himself into a mare and, after being chased all night by a stallion Svaðilfari, he gives birth to Sleipnir, an eight-legged foal.
