Chinese believe, that in actual fact, Nationalist/Communist China was the most powerful combatant on the Allied side during the Second World War, vastly outperforming both the Soviets and the Western allies, to say nothing of the Japanese.

Communist China crushed America and Britain in North Korea. The Soviets destroyed the entire Japanese Kwantung Army while the same Soviets couldn't retake Xinjiang from China in the Ili rebellion from 1944.

China crushed and defeated the entire American led UN force in North Korea and drove the American, British and other UN armies from the Yalu river back south to Seoul. The same American army which occupied defeated Japan.

The British, for example, say

>"Look how many kids these inbred fuckers are producing, total drain on our hospital and benefits system!"

Yet Pakistanis pay absolutely zero attention to this or let it offend them in any way. They simply carry on inbreeding and ignoring the cries against it. I was chatting to a Pakistani taxi driver who is just about to welcome his 6th child.

>"Sick of these cunts now, every week blocking the roads and praying, fuck off to yer mosques you've got enough of em!"

Muslims typically do not make it a habit to pray in public but if the mosques are full will do it without a second thought. No Muslim is running scared to pray in case you complain about him to racists on X. A Muslim will complete his prayers in the middle of a flooded submerged street if that's what it takes.

>"Muhammad is now the most popular boys name in the U.K. This is a joke! sick of it! fucking sick of it"

And a Muslim closes his ears to that and names his latest son 'Muhammad' without a care in the world that you are objecting to it.

And on and on and on.

Muslims may be AWARE of your objections and complaints and they may even acknowledge them in the form of an argument or rebuttal against it but at the end of the day the Muslims will continue doing more of it anyway. There is nothing illegal about cousin marriage, there is nothing illegal about praying, there is nothing illegal about naming your child Muhammad, there is nothing illegal about 'wearing desert dress', there is nothing illegal about entire areas of cities becoming dominated by Muslims, etc.

Muslims are not going to acquiesce to your demands to be less overtly Islamic and shy away from their faith and their culture. Islam permits expression of faith and if it abides by the law of the land then there's nothing you can do to stop it.

>Saraiki
>26 million people
Never heard of them ever

The Coming Incel Revolution

Have liberal-democracy fans ever been able to explain this?

The Irish, Japanese, mexicans, jews or French never faced as much discrimination as italians did. Why? Only blacks suffered more for obvious reasons. Why did the biggest lynching in lousiana was about killing italians? Bonus question? Are european Americans going to be the most discriminated group of the future?

What is the answer to the current Israel-Palestine problem?
Do you think this is a reasonable solution?
>Armistice between Israelis and Gaza
>Implementation of a singular secular state in the Levant where all ethnicities, Arab, Jewish or otherwise, are given equal rights, opportunity and freedom of movement, religion and opinion
>Leaders and combatants from both Hamas and Netanyahu's government are put on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity, if found guilty, all involved governments, parties and institutions are to be immediately disbanded and apprehended
>A Marshall Plan-like collective effort between countries to rebuild destroyed and damaged properties, villages and cities like Gaza
>Families and descendants of Palestinians and native ethnic peoples expelled and displaced from the Levant in the Nakba and afterwards are allowed and given resources to return to Palestine and their original homes
>Those that don't want to return will be given reparation payment for compensation instead
>Palestine will be allowed entry into the UN, Non-Aligned Movement and the Arab League when Arabs become the majority.

But the trade-off is:
>Jerusalem will be the Capital but the secular government will not interfere in the operations of the Old City unless it is to ease or curb tensions
>Allow the Temple Mount to be operated co-jointly by the Jordanian Waqf and Israeli Temple Institute
>Allow the building of the new Jewish Temple beside the Dome of the Rock on the Northern Garden without destroying any existing structures, as shown in pic related
>Jews will be allowed to visit the Temple Mount, although they generally don't want to since it is too sacred for them to just walk into, unless it is a chosen group of religious Jewish officials doing prayers and services in the new Temple
>A platoon of UN peacekeeping/international troops is placed to enforce order in the Old City

That way, both Israelis and Palestinians get something out of it. Or is this still too much?

Why do muslims despise art? Are they stupid?

what US president has the worst defenders on /his/ and why is it Nixon? even his most diehard defenders can't name anything constructive he accomplished.

The moors.... were like that?!
Looks like EEF for me lol