Forgot this
>>81018165>honestly that sounds like nightmare fuel. i hope it never happens again!I went to a talk this morning and you wouldn't know there was a plague of whatever those were 12 hours ago.
>>81018631They'll be back soon. I hope.
>>81018702>people would probably feel more reluctant to post their honest thoughtsIt's not enough to just disagree with that post, they have to dig through posts until they find even more they don't like. Human consciousness wasn't supposed to be used like that...
>I suppose it's like having to read a manual for everything you want to mess withMore or less. It's a pain, but it's a necessary evil in a game with mechanics this extensive.
>Hopefully they've learned their lessonThe beancounters and upper management never learn...
>Have you played that one at all?I continued playing for a while after OSRS' nostalgia wore off but I stopped maybe 10 years ago, then went back of OSRS after they added more stuff. The art style's pretty weird looking and the combat is different but from what I've heard there's some good stuff buried in there, mostly endgame bosses. It has a lot more quests than OSRS and some of them are very good. The soundtrack has some nice orchestral pieces as well, but you'd appreciate that more if you heard the midi originals. It's also kind of a mess because there's 20 years of different design philosophies, graphics, interfaces, and spaghetti code held together with string.
From what I've heard, the "best" way to play is as an ironman, which means you can't trade with other players but it also removes the microtransactions so the achievements feel more real.
It might be trying since you can use the same account/membership for both games, but I'd recommend OSRS over it to most new players.
Someone made a 3 hour long review of the first 100 hours if you want to experience it vicariously.
>>81019135>What do you call a Jamaican proctologist? A Pokemon!He's checking for bloodclaats.
